<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.3.58 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 3.58

# 瑜伽論記 3.58

瑜伽論記 3.58

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.3.58)

問：前學身無學身中俱取解脫分決擇分及無漏業名學無學，彼學身中所有漏分善不善無記業，無學身中福分善業及無記業，豈非并是非學非無學業。若爾，何故復於俱非業云：謂除前二餘相續中所有善不善無記業耶？

> Question: In the previous persons of the trainee and non-trainee, both \[wholesome roots\] contributing to liberation, \[wholesome roots\] contributing to decision, and taintless karma are taken and named trainee and non-trainee; are not all contaminated wholesome, unwholesome, and neutral karma in that trainee person, and the meritorious wholesome karma and neutral karma in the non-trainee person, karma of neither trainee nor non-trainee? If so, why is it said again regarding karma of neither: "it refers to all wholesome, unwholesome, and neutral karma in the remaining continuums, excluding the previous two"?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.3.57)
- [Next: 3.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.3.59)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.3.58) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.3.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.3.58) · Pramāṇa
