[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 4.18 # 瑜伽論記 4.18 瑜伽論記 4.18 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.4.18) 今謂之不然。彼經云三摩提者，即今所言三摩呬多，此云等引，彼云三昧者，舊翻名正受，即今云三摩地，翻名等持，二義別故，上上各名影略互顯也。但恐曉公不別地提二字，濫作斯難。然復勘新翻十卷金光明經，十地定皆名三摩地，此即譯人解音不同也。 > I now maintain that this is not so. That sūtra's 'sanmati' is precisely what is now termed samāhita, translated here as 'equipoise' (dengyin); what it calls 'sanmei' was formerly translated as 'correct reception' (zhenggshou), which is what is now termed samādhi, translated as 'equipoise' (dengchi). Because their two meanings differ, the respective terms in the successive stages obliquely complement and illuminate each other. I only fear that Master Wonhyo did not distinguish the two characters di and ti, and thus raised this objection erroneously. Furthermore, upon checking the newly translated ten-fascicle \*Suvarṇaprabhāsa-sūtra\*, the concentrations of the ten stages are all termed samādhi; this is merely a difference in the translators' understanding of the phonetic sounds. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.4.17) - [Next: 4.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.4.19) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.4.18) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.4.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.4.18) · Pramāṇa