[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 5.225 # 瑜伽論記 5.225 瑜伽論記 5.225 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.225](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.5.225) 第三引喻者總也。同類、異類者別也。於總說法別引於一同品異為二喻故，對法十六中，以因總辨而不別開，於喻之中亦唯申總，但以能成有八數不可乖，於成義中更加合結，此論以合結不離因喻故不別開，彼以成義增明，故別離立，不相違也。陳那以合結不離於喻能立除之。對法以合義重增故別離為能立，引喻總別增減亦然。又云立論者現量等二，疎有悟他古名能立，立敵之者親唯自悟，故陳那等不為能立，不相違也。 > Third, 'citing examples' is general; 'similar class' and 'dissimilar class' are distinct. Regarding the generally stated dharma, separately citing one similar instance and one dissimilar instance constitutes two examples. In the Abhidharmasamuccaya, fascicle sixteen, the reason is treated generally and not divided; within the example, it also only sets forth the general; but because that which establishes has eight members that must not be disrupted, in establishing the meaning, application (upanaya) and conclusion (nigamana) are further added. This treatise, because application and conclusion are not separate from the reason and example, does not divide them separately; that treatise, because establishing the meaning adds clarity, establishes them separately; there is no contradiction. Dignāga eliminates them from that which establishes because application and conclusion are not separate from the example. The Abhidharmasamuccaya, because the meaning of application is repeated and increased, separates them as that which establishes; the increase and decrease between general and distinct in citing examples is likewise so. It is also said that for the debater, the two such as direct perception have a distant role in bringing about understanding in another, which the ancients called that which establishes; while the proponent and opponent directly bring about understanding only in themselves, hence Dignāga and others do not consider them that which establishes; there is no contradiction. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.224](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.5.224) - [Next: 5.226](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.5.226) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.5.225) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.6.125) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.5.225](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.5.225) · Pramāṇa