[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 7.107 # 瑜伽論記 7.107 瑜伽論記 7.107 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.107](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.7.107) 答：俗智有二：一、六行智；二、聖行智。對法約聖行智故緣前七苦，此論據六行智故緣麁靜，義無相違。又彼論約勝分立苦諦，故不取苦苦壞苦，約全分立三諦，故說諸惑業滅及能對治名三諦，此論文約全分立苦諦，勝分建立三諦。 > Answer: Mundane knowledge is of two kinds: first, the knowledge of the six aspects; second, the knowledge of noble practice. The Abhidharma is based on the knowledge of noble practice, hence it takes the first seven sufferings as its object; this treatise is based on the knowledge of the six aspects, hence it takes coarse and tranquil as its object, so there is no contradiction in meaning. Furthermore, that treatise establishes the truth of suffering based on its prominent portion, hence it does not take the suffering of suffering and the suffering of change, but establishes three truths based on their entirety, and thus speaks of the cessation of all afflictions and karma and their antidotes as the three truths; whereas the text of this treatise establishes the truth of suffering based on its entirety and establishes the three truths based on their prominent portions. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.106](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.7.106) - [Next: 7.108](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.7.108) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.7.107) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.7.107](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.7.107) · Pramāṇa