<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.52 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 10.52

# 瑜伽師地論略纂 10.52

瑜伽師地論略纂 10.52

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [10.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.52)

論解自在具足果中云「能以布施攝諸眾生」等者，問：何故異熟大財、大朋、大屬皆自在具足，今果中但言大財為果？答曰：前實作法有大朋等，今以四攝事配信言、大勢具足，故唯布施，無大朋等，故不相違。

> Where the treatise explains the fruit of the perfection of sovereignty, saying, "Being able to gather sentient beings through generosity," and so on, question: Why is it that in the vipāka, great wealth, great associates, and great retinues are all the perfection of sovereignty, whereas here in the fruit it only speaks of great wealth as the fruit? Answer: Previously, in actual practice there were great associates and so on; now, matching the four means of gathering with trustworthy speech and the perfection of great power, it mentions only generosity without great associates and so on, and therefore there is no contradiction.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 10.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.51)
- [Next: 10.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.53)
- [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.10.52) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.9.27) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.52) · Pramāṇa
