<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.62 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 10.62

# 瑜伽師地論略纂 10.62

瑜伽師地論略纂 10.62

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [10.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.62)

論云「一、依如所有姓；二、依盡所有性」者，且如二智：如所有姓即無分別智，緣理之智，如境道理，稱實性而觀；盡所有性即後得智，緣事為境，盡境界性而能觀之。此解大分以理事智別。又觀四諦、十六諦、三空門等觀智，名如所有性。八觀心雖後得智，仍出世後得，緣相見道有性真如故，名如所有性。若後得緣有常無常、有漏無漏等事差別門，不作相見道真如解之世間智，名盡所有性。此即約後得智分為二智，謂世間後得、出世後得解。

> Regarding the treatise's statement: "First, relying on the nature as it is; second, relying on the nature in all its extent": taking for instance the two wisdoms: the nature as it is is the non-conceptual wisdom, the wisdom that takes principle as its object; in accordance with the principle of the object, it contemplates conforming to the real nature. The nature in all its extent is the subsequent wisdom; taking phenomena as its object, it can contemplate them exhausting the nature of the cognitive domain. This explanation broadly divides them by the wisdom of principle and the wisdom of phenomena. Furthermore, the contemplative wisdom that contemplates the four truths, the sixteen aspects of truth, the three gates of emptiness, and so forth, is called the nature as it is. Although the eight contemplative minds are subsequent wisdom, they are still transworldly subsequent \[wisdom\]; because they take the conditioned path of seeing's existent-nature suchness as their object, they are called the nature as it is. If subsequent \[wisdom\] takes the distinct portals of phenomena—such as permanence, impermanence, contaminated, uncontaminated, and so forth—as its object, and is a worldly wisdom that does not understand it as the suchness of the conditioned path of seeing, it is called the nature in all its extent. This is an explanation that divides the subsequent wisdom into two wisdoms: worldly subsequent \[wisdom\] and transworldly subsequent \[wisdom\].  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 10.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.61)
- [Next: 10.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.63)
- [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.10.62) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.9.56) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.10.62) · Pramāṇa
