[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 12.113 # 瑜伽師地論略纂 12.113 瑜伽師地論略纂 12.113 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [12.113](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.113) 論云「謂若彼假設，若於中假設，若由此假設等，乃至若由無上清淨所淨」者，此謂十法明入，如《十地經》。此中有七若字，初五各是明入，後二離為五；第六離為三；第七離為二。「若彼假設」，即有情緣也。謂實無有情，但假設故，名有情，故名假設。第二、「於中假設」者，即世界緣也。謂有情於中住，實無世界，但以於中住故，假設為緣。第三、「若由此假設」者，謂法緣，即十八界善惡法等。謂實無如此法，由此故，觀有情等，名由此假設。第四、「若平等勝義」者，如《十地經》，是空緣。法師二說，一謂事空、二謂理空，即真如云空。此論言平等勝義，故知是真如也。第五、「若染惱故、清淨故，成染成淨」者，識緣也。以識者染惱清淨，故成染成淨。第六、「若由繫縛煩惱所染」者，謂三界緣。即欲、色、無色界繫縛煩惱所染，即為三也。第七、「由無上清淨所淨」者，謂善淨、大善淨。善淨謂二乘淨，大善淨謂大乘淨，即為二也。廣如《地經》。 > The treatise says: "Namely, whether it is designated with reference to that, whether it is designated in that, whether it is designated by means of that, and so on, up to whether it is purified by supreme purification." This refers to the ten entrances into illumination of dharmas, as in the Daśabhūmika-sūtra. Here there are seven instances of the word "whether" (若). The first five are each an entrance into illumination; the latter two are divided into five—the sixth is divided into three, and the seventh is divided into two. "Whether it is designated with reference to that" refers to the objective support of sentient beings: because in reality there are no sentient beings, but they are only designated, they are called "sentient beings," and thus it is called "designation." Second, "whether it is designated in that" refers to the objective support of the world: sentient beings dwell in it, but in reality there is no world; it is merely because they dwell in it that it is designated as an objective support. Third, "whether it is designated by means of that" refers to the objective support of dharmas, namely the wholesome and unwholesome dharmas among the eighteen elements and so forth: in reality there are no such dharmas; because of these, one contemplates sentient beings and so forth, so it is called "designated by means of that." Fourth, "whether it is the equal ultimate truth": as in the Daśabhūmika-sūtra, this is the objective support of emptiness. The Dharma Master gives two explanations: the first is emptiness of phenomena, and the second is emptiness of principle, that is, tathatā is called emptiness; this treatise speaks of "equal ultimate truth," so we know it is tathatā. Fifth, "whether it becomes defiled or purified due to affliction or purity" refers to the objective support of consciousness: because consciousness is afflicted or purified, it becomes defiled or purified. Sixth, "whether it is defiled by the afflictions of bondage" refers to the objective supports of the three realms: being defiled by the afflictions bound to the desire, form, and formless realms constitutes three. Seventh, "whether it is purified by supreme purification" refers to wholesome purification and great wholesome purification: wholesome purification refers to the purification of the two vehicles, and great wholesome purification refers to the purification of the Great Vehicle, which makes two. The details are as in the Daśabhūmika-sūtra. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 12.112](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.112) - [Next: 12.114](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.114) - [Up: 12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.12.113) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [瑜伽師地論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.yogacarabhumi*zh-xuanzang.48.28) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.113](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.113) · Pramāṇa