[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 12.210 # 瑜伽師地論略纂 12.210 瑜伽師地論略纂 12.210 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [12.210](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.210) 論云云何地施設安立？謂有餘依地，除五地一分，謂無心地、修所成地、聲聞、獨覺、菩薩地；除無餘依一地全；所餘諸地，名有餘依者，十七地中，如此文以十一地全、五地少分為此地體。所以者何？五地之中，且如無心地中有五位無心，謂無心睡眠、無想定及滅盡定、入無餘依涅槃界等，今唯取前四位，除無餘依涅槃，故言一分，是此地體。修所成地中，修成有無二為，其無為是無餘依體，今除之，取修成有為。　問曰：但是修，何故有無為之言？義曰：直言修慧者，即不取無為，今言修所成，既有所成之言，故貫通無為也。其聲聞等地通明四諦，其滅諦中有因盡、果盡無為，今簡去果盡無為，故除一分。無餘地，即所除全也。　問曰：餘地亦有非此地體者，何故唯除此五地一分也？義曰：從多相從論。又隨顯相者取除，其隱相非此地體者，略而不論。 > The treatise says: How is this bhūmi posited and established? The Bhūmi with Remainder of Basis excludes one portion of five bhūmis—namely, the Mindless Bhūmi, the Bhūmi Arisen from Cultivation, and the Śrāvaka, Pratyekabuddha, and Bodhisattva Bhūmis; it excludes the Bhūmi without Remainder of Basis entirely; the remaining bhūmis are called with remainder of basis. Among the seventeen bhūmis, according to this text, eleven bhūmis in full and five bhūmis in minor part constitute the substance of this bhūmi. Why is this? Among the five bhūmis, taking the Mindless Bhūmi as an example, there are five states of mindlessness: mindless sleep, the non-conceptual attainment, the cessation attainment, entering the realm of nirvāṇa without remainder of basis, and so forth. Here it takes only the first four states, excluding nirvāṇa without remainder of basis; therefore it says "one portion" is the substance of this bhūmi. Within the Bhūmi Arisen from Cultivation, what is produced through cultivation includes both the conditioned and unconditioned; the unconditioned is the substance of the remainderless basis, which is now excluded, taking the conditioned produced through cultivation. Question: If it is only cultivation, why is there mention of the unconditioned? Answer: If one merely speaks of wisdom from cultivation, that does not take the unconditioned; now, saying "arisen from cultivation," since there is the word "arisen," it therefore extends through to the unconditioned. As for the Śrāvaka and other bhūmis, they universally explain the four truths; within the truth of cessation there is the unconditioned of the exhaustion of causes and the exhaustion of results; now, setting aside the unconditioned of the exhaustion of results, one portion is therefore excluded. The Remainderless Bhūmi is precisely what is excluded in its entirety. Question: The other bhūmis also contain what is not the substance of this bhūmi; why then does it only exclude one portion of these five bhūmis? Answer: The discussion proceeds in accordance with the predominant share. Furthermore, it takes and excludes according to the prominent characteristics; those whose non-substantiality to this bhūmi is hidden are briefly passed over without discussion. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 12.209](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.209) - [Next: 12.211](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.211) - [Up: 12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.12.210) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (2) - [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.12.486) — Classical Chinese - [瑜伽師地論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.yogacarabhumi*zh-xuanzang.50.122) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.210](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.12.210) · Pramāṇa