[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 13.81 # 瑜伽師地論略纂 13.81 瑜伽師地論略纂 13.81 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [13.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.13.81) 論云「何以故？由一切行皆剎那故，從其餘方，從至餘方，不應道理」者，此破正量部等。然如先立量云，應先成有剎那滅已，方可破無行動。應先立量云：諸色塵等應剎那滅，色蘊攝故，如燈焰鈴聲。燈焰鈴聲，他共許故。方立量云：無有此處之色往至餘處，剎那滅故，如燈焰等。此剎那滅因方是極成。「又離唯諸行生，餘實作用由眼、耳、意皆不可得」者，此亦破正量部實行動作用有，又破薩婆多業色極微性實作用，又破吠世師業句實性。今總非之云：無別實作用，如眼、耳、意所取三業皆不可得。彼雖行動及業色皆眼等所取，與彼為隨一不成過，此不許眼識等得故。量云：汝言行動、業色等，不名離諸行外，由眼、耳、意定不可得，現、比二量所不知故，如兔角等。意業雖通三性，然取思作表，了作用義等。是故當知一切表業皆是假有。　問：若色等中假業，如色處中表，表此破大乘眼識等緣不？西方兩釋，五識緣假依實，如《對法》第一抄解。 > Regarding the treatise's statement, "Why? Because all conditioned phenomena are momentary, and going from one direction to arrive in another direction is not reasonable": this refutes the Saṃmatīyas and others. However, in formulating the syllogism (prayoga) as before, one should first establish momentary cessation before one can refute the absence of motion. One should first formulate the inference: "Visible form-objects and the like must cease moment by moment, because they are subsumed under the aggregate of form (rūpa-skandha), like a lamp flame or the sound of a bell." Lamp flames and the sound of a bell are commonly accepted by the other party. Only then does one formulate the inference: "No form in this place goes and arrives in another place, because it ceases moment by moment, like a lamp flame and the like." In this way, this reason—"momentary cessation"—is fully established (prasiddha). Regarding "Furthermore, apart from the mere arising of conditioned phenomena, no other real function can be apprehended by the eye, ear, or mind": this also refutes the Saṃmatīya claim of the real existence of motion and function; it also refutes the Sarvāstivādin real function of the atomic nature of action-form (karma-rūpa); and it refutes the real nature of the category of action (karma-padārtha) in the Vaiśeṣika system. Now, generally rejecting them, it says: There is no distinct real function; for just like \[real functions\], the three types of actions apprehended by the eye, ear, and mind are all unapprehended. Although motion and action-form are claimed by them to be apprehended by the eye and the like, this incurs the fault of being unestablished for one party (anyatarāsiddha) against them, because this \[Mahāyāna\] does not accept that the visual consciousness and the like apprehend them. The inference runs: "What you call motion, action-form, and so forth cannot be called something existing apart from conditioned phenomena; they are definitively unapprehended by the eye, ear, and mind; because they are not cognized by the two pramāṇas of perception and inference; like a rabbit's horn and the like." Although mental action ranges through the three natures, taking volition (cetanā) to constitute intimation makes clear the meaning of function and so on. Therefore, one should know that all intimation-actions (vijñapti-karma) are nominal existents. Question: If action within form and the like is nominal—such as the intimation within visible matter—does this intimation negate that the Mahāyāna visual consciousness and the like take it as an object? Western scholars offer two explanations: the five consciousnesses take the nominal as an object by relying on the real, as explained in the commentary on the first fascicle of the Abhidharma-samuccaya-vyākhyā. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 13.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.13.80) - [Next: 13.82](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.13.82) - [Up: 13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.13) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.13.81) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.18) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.13.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.13.81) · Pramāṇa