[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 14.28 # 瑜伽師地論略纂 14.28 瑜伽師地論略纂 14.28 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [14.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.14.28) 論云「復由五相應知名不如理思議極微」者，第一、謂婆沙多極微雖無獨住，然諸聚色中有彼自體。正破一切有部，兼破吠世史迦。第二、有生有滅，正是一切有部。其吠世史迦父母極微是常，餘是無常，今兼破之。第三、正是吠世史迦，以彼計云：劫初父母極微於空劫中散住處處，後成劫時，父母和合而生子微，名合。第四、正是一切有部，以積極微成聚色故。又云：正量部義，彼無隣虛，有積集故。第五、吠世史迦以父母微和合故生子種，種名麁重色。以微無體，無體故即無生滅，無生滅故無合無散，不可言聚色從微生等。以此理知，如前五計皆為不如理。 > The treatise says: "Furthermore, through five marks one should know that atoms are improperly speculated upon." First, it refers to the Vibhāṣā's \[view that\] although many atoms do not abide independently, they have their own intrinsic nature within gathered form. This directly refutes the Sarvāstivāda, and incidentally refutes the Vaiśeṣika. Second, they have arising and cessation; this is precisely the Sarvāstivāda. The parent atoms of the Vaiśeṣika are permanent and the others are impermanent; now it incidentally refutes them. Third, this is precisely the Vaiśeṣika, because they postulate that: at the beginning of an eon, the parent atoms dwell scattered in various places within the empty eon; later, at the time of the formation eon, the parent \[atoms\] combine and produce child atoms, which is called "combination." Fourth, this is precisely the Sarvāstivāda, because the aggregation of atoms accomplishes gathered form. Another explanation says: It is the doctrine of the Sāṃmitīya, because they lack adjacent-void \[atoms\] and have accumulation. Fifth, the Vaiśeṣika holds that because parent atoms combine, they produce child seeds, and the seeds are called heavy, coarse form. Because an atom has no substance, since it has no substance it has neither arising nor cessation; having neither arising nor cessation, it has neither combination nor dispersion, and one cannot say that gathered form arises from atoms, and so forth. By this reasoning one knows that, like the preceding five views, all are improper. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 14.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.14.27) - [Next: 14.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.14.29) - [Up: 14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.14) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.14.28) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.293) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.14.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.14.28) · Pramāṇa