[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 15.62 # 瑜伽師地論略纂 15.62 瑜伽師地論略纂 15.62 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [15.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.15.62) 論云「命根無屬」者，法師云：故知命根不唯第八心王，通同時五數上立。今解不然，違《顯揚》文。又根本餘勢分，如男、女、三無漏，皆取彼所依根一少分為體，似本色心。此依上假立，不是所依根之分，故言無所屬，非謂通立五心所上並也。如《對法論》及抄。 > The treatise says: 'The life faculty has no subordination.' The Dharma Master says: Hence we know that the life faculty is not solely established upon the eighth primary mind, but pervades the five simultaneous mental factors. Now this interpretation is not correct, as it contradicts the text of the Prakaraṇāryavācā. Furthermore, \[the life faculty\] is the remaining momentum of the root; like male, female, and the three undefiled faculties, which all take a minor portion of their supporting faculty as their essence, resembling root form and mind. This is nominally designated upon them, and is not a part of the supporting faculties; hence it is said to have no subordination, not that it is established across the five mental factors alongside \[mind\]. As in the Abhidharmasamuccaya and its Commentary. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 15.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.15.61) - [Next: 15.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.15.63) - [Up: 15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.15) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.15.62) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.16.44) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.15.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.15.62) · Pramāṇa