[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 3.95 # 瑜伽師地論略纂 3.95 瑜伽師地論略纂 3.95 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.95](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.3.95) 破中有二：初別破、後結之。別破有二：初、四重破外道空見；後、破內道空見。　四重破外道空見者，前敘執有六：初三執合為一門破，後三各一破故。　「若俱有者，汝先所說無有施無」等者，彼師本計不撥全無因之與果，依靜慮故，見世行施，生賤貧家，謂施無能，便謗少分，故今問彼生後二業為俱若不俱？若彼全撥無一切者，此難不成。　「離想欲」者，離諸有想之欲，即無想天是。餘二如次，離色界欲及入涅槃。彼計有離下欲界欲，不許有離已上地欲。三定以下，彼說非無，獨撥餘無，便乖比量。　「為有阿羅漢性，而於彼起增上慢」者，此意問言：為世間有真阿羅漢，而起增上慢，自謂阿羅漢。為有此，為無耶？若有者，無真阿羅漢不成。若無真阿羅漢者，起顛倒執，自謂阿羅漢，應是阿羅漢不倒，既非顛倒者，應是真。　破內空見中，「應無顛倒」，所執也；「染」，依他也；「淨」，圓成也。　又顛倒者，亂心；染，謂三雜染；淨，謂二淨。既勝義中都無此者，便無生死，亦無涅槃，何欣何厭？何得何捨？如《唯識》等，及此論徵，皆如理解。 > In the refutation, there are two parts: first, separate refutations; later, the conclusion. The separate refutations have two parts: first, fourfold refutations of the non-Buddhist views of emptiness; later, refuting the Buddhist view of emptiness. In the fourfold refutation of the non-Buddhist views of emptiness, the previous recounting of attachments had six: the first three attachments are combined into one section for refutation, and the latter three are each refuted individually. Regarding “If both exist, what you previously said about 'there is no giving',” and so forth: that teacher's original theory did not deny all causes and fruits; relying on dhyāna, seeing that in the world those who practice giving are born into poor and base families, they thought that giving has no efficacy, and thus denigrated a part. Therefore, it now asks them whether the two karmas of subsequent lives are co-existent or not co-existent. If they had completely denied everything, this objection would not hold. “Detached from desire with ideation” means detaching from the desire of all \[spheres\] having ideation, which is the heaven of non-conception. The other two are, respectively, detaching from desire of the form realm and entering nirvāṇa. They reckon that there is detachment from the lower desire realm's desires, but do not concede that there is detachment from desires of higher realms. Below the third dhyāna, they say it is not non-existent, but denying the remainder alone violates inferential reasoning. Regarding “Is there an arhat-nature, regarding which an exaggerated pride arises?”: this intended question says, does there exist a true arhat in the world regarding which exaggerated pride arises, claiming oneself to be an arhat? Does this exist, or does it not? If it exists, \[the claim that\] there are no true arhats fails. If there are no true arhats, one who gives rise to inverted grasping and calls oneself an arhat should be an arhat who is not inverted; since they are not inverted, they should be true. In refuting the internal view of emptiness: “there should be no inversion” refers to the imagined \[nature\]; “defilement” refers to the dependent \[nature\]; “purity” refers to the consummate \[nature\]. Furthermore, inversion refers to the confused mind; defilement refers to the three defilements; purity refers to the two purities. Since in the ultimate truth none of these exist at all, then there would be neither saṃsāra nor nirvāṇa; what would there be to delight in or loathe? What to attain or abandon? As in the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi and so forth, and the cross-examinations in this treatise, all should be understood in accordance with reason. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.3.94) - [Next: 3.96](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.3.96) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.3.95) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (3) - [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.331) — Classical Chinese - [瑜伽師地論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.yogacarabhumi*zh-xuanzang.7.145) — Classical Chinese - [顯揚聖教論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.prakaranaryavacasastra*zh-xuanzang.10.54) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.3.95](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.3.95) · Pramāṇa