[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 5.7 # 瑜伽師地論略纂 5.7 瑜伽師地論略纂 5.7 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.5.7) 第二、安立中有三：初引經標；次隨別釋；後「世尊於無漏方便」下，釋三摩地與解脫前後妨難。　「欲所引喜」等，顯示所離，所證轉依無為名離故。　「又於五法修習圓滿」者，顯由轉依所生之法。歡、喜俱以喜受為性，無悔所引正深慶悅，立二差別。安、樂俱以樂受為性，離諸麁重所引調暢，調暢所引二種樂果，立二差別。即前第五卷云離生喜樂。然此二受俱是適悅，皆由意生，總名為喜，故此但言說離生喜。不爾，諸文便為乖角。　欲所引中不說捨者，欲所引捨，而非忻樂，厭惡欲故，而非所斷；不善引捨，不善性故，正是所斷。故說不同。 > In the second, the establishment, there are three \[parts\]: first, citing the sūtra to state \[the topic\]; second, explaining each separately; and third, from "the World-Honoured One, regarding the mundane upāya" onward, resolving difficulties concerning the sequence of samādhi and vimokṣa. > "The joy induced by desires" and so forth displays that which is to be separated from, because the unconditioned \[state\] of āśraya-parāvṛtti that is realized is called separation. > "Furthermore, having practiced and perfected the five dharmas" displays the dharmas produced through āśraya-parāvṛtti. Gladness and joy both have joyful feeling as their nature; \[they are\] established as two differences because of the truly deep jubilation induced by absence of regret. Tranquillity and ease both have pleasant feeling as their nature; \[they are\] established as two differences because of the adaptability induced by separating from all dauṣṭhulya, and the two kinds of pleasant fruit induced by adaptability. This is what was referred to in the preceding fifth fascicle as joy and pleasure born of separation. However, since these two feelings are both pleasing and both born of manas, they are collectively called "joy"; therefore here it only speaks of joy born of separation. If it were not so, the various passages would conflict. > As for not speaking of equanimity among that which is induced by desires: equanimity induced by desires is not delight, and because one is weary of desires, it is not what is to be abandoned; whereas equanimity induced by unwholesomeness, being unwholesome by nature, is precisely what is to be abandoned. Therefore their statements differ. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.5.6) - [Next: 5.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.5.8) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.5.7) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.4.34) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.5.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.5.7) · Pramāṇa