<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.9.11 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829) › 9.11

# 瑜伽師地論略纂 9.11

瑜伽師地論略纂 9.11

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [9.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.9.11)

論第三翻解作意中云「又了相作意，於所應斷，乃至勝解作意，為斷為得，正發加行」者，如二十八云：前二作意皆加行道，今此唯以解脫為正加行者，今據勝上處及隣近無間道處，及不為聞思間處說，故唯說勝解為正加行。前二十八約實為論，了相應亦是加行。　又解：此正發加行未必簡了相非加行道，以勝解隣近分勝故，說定正發加行。且說勝解為正加行道，不遮了相，據實無違。如《對法抄》會。

> Regarding the śāstra's third round of explaining the manaskāras, which states: "Furthermore, the manaskāra of understanding the characteristics, with respect to what is to be severed, and so forth, up to the manaskāra of resolute conviction, properly generates praxis in order to sever and to attain": since the twenty-eighth \[fascicle\] states that the first two manaskāras are both the path of praxis, why does the present \[text\] speak only of resolute conviction as the proper praxis? The answer is: here it speaks in terms of the superior place, the place adjacent to the unobstructed path, and the place uninterrupted by hearing and reflection; therefore it speaks only of resolute conviction as the proper praxis. The earlier twenty-eighth \[fascicle\] discussed it according to the actual state of affairs, \[wherein\] understanding the characteristics should also be praxis. Another explanation is: this "properly generating praxis" does not necessarily exclude understanding the characteristics from being the path of praxis; because resolute conviction is superior in being adjacent \[to the unobstructed path\], it is definitively said to "properly generate praxis." It provisionally speaks of resolute conviction as the proper path of praxis without precluding understanding the characteristics, so in fact there is no contradiction, as harmonized in the Notes on the Abhidharma.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 9.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.9.10)
- [Next: 9.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.9.12)
- [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.9)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829~en-mt.9.11) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.8.34) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.9.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.9.11) · Pramāṇa
