<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.14 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 1.14

# 成唯識論述記 1.14

成唯識論述記 1.14

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.14)

此論第二云：法、辭二無礙解。境有差別，法緣名等，辭緣於聲。又《解深密經》及《瑜伽》七十八說：第九地斷二種愚：一、於無量所說無量名、句、字陀羅尼自在愚。下此論第九云：無量名、句、字是法無礙解。又此論及《佛地》云：十八界通無漏善，故為教體，於理無違。問：若明教體一切唯識，如何乃言佛菩薩說？答：《無性釋》云：彼增上生，故作是說。《二十唯識》天親解云：展轉增上力，二識成決定。謂餘相續識差別故，令餘相續差別識生，展轉互為增上緣故。

> The second fascicle of this treatise states: 'There are two unhindered analytical knowledges: dharma and nirukti. Their objects differ: dharma takes names and so forth as its object, while nirukti takes sound as its object.' Furthermore, the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra and the seventy-eighth fascicle of the Yogācārabhūmi state: 'On the ninth bhūmi, two kinds of ignorance are severed: first, the ignorance regarding mastery over dhāraṇīs of immeasurable spoken names, sentences, and syllables.' Below, in the ninth fascicle of this treatise, it states: 'Immeasurable names, sentences, and syllables constitute the unhindered analytical knowledge of dharma.' Furthermore, this treatise and the Buddhabhūmi-śāstra state that the eighteen dhātus pertain to anāsrava goodness; therefore, taking them as the substance of the teaching does not contradict reason. Question: If the substance of the teaching is explained as everything being vijñapti-mātra, why then say that it is spoken by Buddhas and bodhisattvas? Answer: Asvabhāva's commentary states: 'It arises from their predominant influence, hence it is spoken of in this way.' In the Viṃśikā-vijñaptimātratā, Vasubandhu explains: 'By mutual predominant power, two consciousnesses become determined.' This means that because of the distinction in the consciousness of another continuum, a distinct consciousness is made to arise in another continuum, because they mutually serve as predominant conditions (adhipati-pratyaya) for one another.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.13)
- [Next: 1.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.15)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.1.14) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.14) · Pramāṇa
