[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 1.32 # 成唯識論述記 1.32 成唯識論述記 1.32 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.32) 於所歸敬合有七釋。三如《樞要》。今以理准四義不同。一者唯敬法而非人。法有二種。一教。二理。佛證唯識說一心經令依修學。既涅槃已教便散滅。由論本師造三十頌顯唯識理。散滅之法令其集顯。論文雖舉滿．分二人。意取二人所證所說識性教．理。滿清淨者於教為勝。本教主故。分清淨者於理為勝。顯理勝故。由於識性滿．分淨故。如來能說教。弟子能顯理。故今歸敬唯法非人何故但敬法而非人諸佛所師所謂法故。佛及弟子從此生故二者但敬人而非法。即是唯識本．釋二師。本謂如來。於唯識性滿清淨者。釋謂頌主。於唯識性分清淨者。唯識性聲境第七攝。是能差別。 > Regarding that to which refuge and homage are paid, there are seven explanations in total. Three are as in the Shunyao. Now, inferring from principle, there are four different meanings: First, revering solely the Dharma and not persons. The Dharma has two kinds: first, teaching; second, principle. The Buddha, having realized vijñapti-mātra, spoke the sūtras of one mind to cause beings to practice in accordance with them. Once he entered nirvāṇa, the teachings were dispersed and lost. It was through the root master of the treatise composing the thirty verses to reveal the principle of vijñapti-mātra that the dispersed and lost Dharma was gathered and made manifest. Although the text of the treatise mentions two persons, the completely and partially \[pure\], the intent is to take the teaching and principle of the nature of consciousness realized and taught by these two persons. The completely pure is superior regarding teaching, because he is the original lord of the teaching. The partially pure is superior regarding principle, because he is superior in revealing principle. Because they are completely or partially pure regarding the nature of consciousness, the Tathāgata is able to expound the teaching, and the disciple is able to reveal the principle. Therefore, this homage is solely to the Dharma, not to persons. Why revere only the Dharma and not persons? Because that which all Buddhas take as teacher is what is called the Dharma, and the Buddha and disciples are born from this. Second, revering solely persons and not the Dharma. That is, the two masters of vijñapti-mātra: the root \[master\] and the commenting \[master\]. The root refers to the Tathāgata, who is completely pure regarding the nature of vijñapti-mātra. The commenting \[master\] refers to the author of the verses, who is partially pure regarding the nature of vijñapti-mātra. The sound-object “nature of vijñapti-mātra” is subsumed under the seventh case; it is that which qualifies. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.31) - [Next: 1.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.33) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.1.32) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.1.32) · Pramāṇa