[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 10.167 # 成唯識論述記 10.167 成唯識論述記 10.167 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [10.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.167) 述曰：若自性，若所依，若因緣，若所緣，若行相，若任持，若助伴等，合一十六門解三智。除初解自性外，餘十五門解之。自性者，彼云：離五種相，以為無分別智性：一、離無作意，熟眠、醉等非彼智故；二、離有尋伺地，第二定以上非故；三、離想受滅寂靜故，即智不成，定無心等故；四、如色自性便非是智，如大種故；五、離於真義異計度故，計度是有分別，非無分別故，言所依者，智所依，若是心者，心是思量，說智無分別不應正理；若所依非心，能依名智亦不應理，即智所依非心是心，由所依止是心種類，心所引生故是心，非思量故非心。故彼頌言「非心而是心」等。言因緣者，彼頌言「諸菩薩因緣，有言聞熏習」等，即以聞熏習為因緣。言所緣者，彼頌言「諸菩薩所緣，不可言法性」，即真如是，遍計所執法皆不可言。不可言性，謂二無我所顯真如，是即無分別智所緣也，即是三種無分別智所緣也。言「行」者，彼言行相。彼頌云：「諸菩薩行相，復於所緣中，是無分別智，彼於所知無相」，即此智於所緣中，所現無相，能、所二緣平等平等，生無異相，如眼取色見青等相，非此青相與色有異故。此中且舉五門，餘十一門如彼論解。總是第一出體名門。 > The Commentary states: In terms of intrinsic nature, support, primary cause, intentional object, cognitive aspect, sustaining support, accompaniment, and so forth, altogether sixteen gates are used to explain the three wisdoms. Aside from the first, which explains intrinsic nature, the remaining fifteen gates explain them. As for intrinsic nature, that text states that the nature of non-conceptual wisdom is defined by being free from five kinds of marks: 1. free from non-mental-application, because deep sleep, intoxication, and so on are not that wisdom; 2. free from stages with examination and investigation, because stages from the second dhyāna upward are not that; 3. free from the quietude of the cessation of ideation and feeling, because then wisdom is not established, as the samāpatti is devoid of mind and so on; 4. like the intrinsic nature of matter, it would not be wisdom, as in the case of the great elements; 5. free from false conceptualization regarding true meaning, because conceptualization is conceptual and not non-conceptual. As for support: if the support of wisdom is mind, mind is discursive reflection, and saying that wisdom is non-conceptual would not be reasonable; if its support is not mind, that the supported is called wisdom would also not be reasonable. Thus the support of wisdom is neither mind nor non-mind: because the support is of the category of mind and is produced by mind, it is mind; because it is not discursive reflection, it is not mind. Therefore its verse says, "It is not mind and yet is mind," and so on. As for primary cause, its verse says: "The primary cause of the bodhisattvas has the verbal hearing-vāsanā," and so forth; that is, it takes hearing-vāsanā as its primary cause. As for intentional object, its verse says: "The intentional object of the bodhisattvas is the ineffable dharmatā"; that is tathatā. Dharmas of conceptualized nature are all ineffable. The ineffable nature refers to the tathatā revealed by the two kinds of selflessness; this is the intentional object of non-conceptual wisdom, which is the intentional object of all three kinds of non-conceptual wisdom. As for "practice", it means cognitive aspect. Its verse states: "The cognitive aspect of the bodhisattvas, furthermore, with respect to the intentional object, is non-conceptual wisdom; with respect to the knowable, it is signless." That is, when this wisdom is directed toward its intentional object, what appears is signless; the two conditions of grasper and grasped are completely equal, arising without different marks, just as the eye apprehending form sees the mark of blue and so on, without this mark of blue being different from form. Here, five gates are briefly cited for now; the remaining eleven gates are as explained in that treatise. This completes the first gate setting out the essences and names. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 10.166](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.166) - [Next: 10.168](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.168) - [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.10.167) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [攝大乘論釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.mahayanasamgraha!bhasya*zh-xuanzang.8.63) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.167) · Pramāṇa