<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.248 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 10.248

# 成唯識論述記 10.248

成唯識論述記 10.248

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [10.248](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.248)

述曰：此等障菩提分法，故四地斷。問：如何身見等障菩提分？答：由有身見等俱愛迷執身故，不得觀身為不淨，觀法為無我等故，障菩提分即通障也，《中邊》第一有菩提分障。問：既是所知障，何故立煩惱名？

> The Commentary states: These obstruct the factors of enlightenment; hence they are severed in the fourth ground. Question: How do identity-view and so forth obstruct the factors of enlightenment? Answer: Because of the craving, delusion, and grasping at the body conjoined with identity-view and so forth, one cannot contemplate the body as impure, contemplate dharmas as non-self, and so forth; thus they obstruct the factors of enlightenment, which is a general obstruction. Chapter 1 of the Madhyāntavibhāga contains obstructions to the factors of enlightenment. Question: Since it is a cognitive obstruction, why establish the name of affliction?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 10.247](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.247)
- [Next: 10.249](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.249)
- [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.10.248) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.248](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.248) · Pramāṇa
