<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.250 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 10.250

# 成唯識論述記 10.250

成唯識論述記 10.250

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [10.250](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.250)

述曰：亦顯以上所知障立煩惱名，雖有別頭生者，皆多分與煩惱同一體而俱起故，立煩惱之名。由所知障斷故，煩惱之末亦永不行，從煩惱名故說為斷。問：何故初、二、三地不斷我見等耶？答：非障法故。

> The Commentary states: This also clarifies that the cognitive obstructions above are given the names of afflictions. Although some arise separately, they mostly share the same essence and arise together with afflictions; hence they are given the name of afflictions. Because the cognitive obstructions are severed, the branch afflictions also never operate again; by following the name of afflictions, they are said to be severed. Question: Why are self-view and so forth not severed in the first, second, and third grounds? Answer: Because they are not obstructing factors.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 10.249](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.249)
- [Next: 10.251](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.251)
- [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.10.250) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.250](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.10.250) · Pramāṇa
