[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 2.27 # 成唯識論述記 2.27 成唯識論述記 2.27 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.27) 述曰：此第二、極微無方分，見、觸無差難也。即事申理，若執極微都無方分，眼見壁等，及手觸時，唯得所見、觸之此邊，不得所不見、觸之彼分，此和合物即諸極微。極微無方分，見、觸此邊之時，應亦得於彼分；此即彼故；彼如於此，為量同前。麁色方分既即極微，故知極微定有方分。 > The Commentary states: This is the second objection: that if atoms lack spatial parts, seeing and touching would admit of no distinction. Setting forth the reasoning from facts: if one holds that atoms completely lack spatial parts, when the eye sees a wall and the like, or the hand touches it, one grasps only this side that is seen or touched, and does not grasp that other part that is not seen or touched; yet this composite object is precisely the atoms. If atoms lack spatial parts, when seeing or touching this side, one should also grasp that part; because this is precisely that; that is just like this—the formal inference being the same as before. Since coarse matter's spatial parts are precisely the atoms, we know atoms definitely have spatial parts. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.26) - [Next: 2.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.28) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.2.27) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.27) · Pramāṇa