[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 2.332 # 成唯識論述記 2.332 成唯識論述記 2.332 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.332](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.332) 述曰：下有二難，此為厭色齊心難。論主將難，先牒彼義，但言入定，唯牒其定，不牒其果，例同破也。若入此二無心之位，有別實法異色、心等能礙於心，名無心定者，次下正難。 > The Commentary states: Below there are two refutations; this is the refutation based on revulsion toward form matching that toward mind. As the author of the treatise is about to present the refutation, he first cites their position; he only mentions entering the absorption, citing only the absorption and not its fruit, refuting them as analogous. If, when entering these two mindless states, there were a distinct real entity different from form, mind, and so forth that could obstruct the mind and be called the mindless absorption, then the following directly refutes it. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.331](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.331) - [Next: 2.333](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.333) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.2.332) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.332](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.332) · Pramāṇa