[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 2.511 # 成唯識論述記 2.511 成唯識論述記 2.511 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.511](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.511) 述曰：非擇無為體是一者，一法緣闕得不生時，應於一切法得非擇滅；以非擇體唯是一故；如已所得非擇之法。問：何故難空？令色中有空；次難令亦得餘部品擇滅；後難令亦得餘法非擇滅。 > The Commentary states: If the substance of the unconditioned cessation not through deliberation were one, then when a single phenomenon lacks conditions and attains non-arising, one should attain cessation not through deliberation regarding all phenomena, because the substance of non-deliberation is solely one—just like the phenomenon of non-deliberation already attained. Question: Why first refute space by forcing that there is space in form; next refute it by forcing that one would also attain the cessation through deliberation of other categories and grades; and finally refute it by forcing that one would also attain the cessation not through deliberation of other phenomena? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.510](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.510) - [Next: 2.512](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.512) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.2.511) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.511](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.511) · Pramāṇa