<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.656 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 2.656

# 成唯識論述記 2.656

成唯識論述記 2.656

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.656](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.656)

述曰：就破似事、共法之中，上來已破依類不成，自下復破依實不成。於中有二：初破；後結。破中有二：初無共不成破；後在人非德破。此初也。等者，等取別性，此、彼等，隨其所應，猛、赤等德非共有故。此中總非，下顯非共。

> The Commentary states: In the refutation of the resembling entity and the shared property, the above has already refuted that \[the designation\] is not established based on genus. Below, it further refutes that it is not established based on substance. In this there are two: first, the refutation; second, the conclusion. Within the refutation there are two: first, the refutation that it cannot be established without something shared; second, the refutation that it resides in man and is not a quality. This is the first. 'And the like' includes distinctness, posteriority, priority, and so forth, as appropriate. Because qualities such as ferocity and redness are not shared: this is a general rejection here, and below shows why they are not shared.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.655](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.655)
- [Next: 2.657](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.657)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.2.656) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.656](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.656) · Pramāṇa
