[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 2.69 # 成唯識論述記 2.69 成唯識論述記 2.69 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.69) 述曰：和合既假說，許是所緣識上有相，不許是緣，以假無體故。 > The Commentary states: Since the combination is nominally posited, it is accepted to be the object (ālambana) because there is an aspect upon consciousness, but not accepted to be a condition (pratyaya), because being nominal, it lacks real entity. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.68) - [Next: 2.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.70) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.2.69) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.69) · Pramāṇa