[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 2.778 # 成唯識論述記 2.778 成唯識論述記 2.778 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.778](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.778) 述曰：此安惠等難。問：生等與法非因果，不可例同於種子者，此與諸法既非一異；有因果故；應如瓶等，是假非實。瓶為假果體，色等為因故。 > The Commentary states: This is an objection by Sthiramati and others. Question: If origination and the like are not cause and effect with dharmas and cannot be analogized to seeds, then since these \[seeds\] are neither one nor different from all dharmas and there are cause and effect, they should be like a vase and the like: nominal and not real. This is because the vase is the substance of a nominal effect, while form and so forth are the causes. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.777](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.777) - [Next: 2.779](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.779) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.2.778) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.778](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.778) · Pramāṇa