[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 2.929 # 成唯識論述記 2.929 成唯識論述記 2.929 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.929](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.929) 述曰：自下正難：種子亦應由相有染，不名無漏，何故彼論說，諸異生唯成無漏種，不言成現行？現行、種子性之與相皆類同故。下申正義。外人問曰：若爾，心性淨者，此是何法？ > The Commentary states: From here down, the treatise directly objects: Seeds should also, because their marks have defilement, not be called anāsrava. Why does their treatise say that all ordinary beings possess only anāsrava seeds, and does not say they possess active manifestations? For the nature and marks of active manifestations and seeds are completely of the same category. Below, the correct doctrine is set forth. The opponent asks: 'If so, then when it is said that the nature of mind is pure, what dharma is this?' > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.928](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.928) - [Next: 2.930](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.930) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.2.929) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.929](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.2.929) · Pramāṇa