<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.103 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 4.103

# 成唯識論述記 4.103

成唯識論述記 4.103

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.103)

述曰：五種姓中無性有情，不能窮解其源底故，說為甚深，此唯凡夫。餘二乘種姓決定者，若凡若聖不能通達，謂不能證故名甚細。通達者，謂無漏道真證得之。彼不證故，非不為說，名不通達。不愚法聲聞亦信聞故，然不造修，由此有生無色入滅定等。非有大乘種姓若聖若凡，及二乘中若凡若聖不定姓者，佛不為說。若彼定姓大乘凡夫亦不為說，即誰造修真唯識觀？我等如何得聞此識？二乘迴心若凡若聖，皆不為說，應不名迴心，不作唯識觀、三性觀等。唯此所除，佛不為說令其證入，非不除者亦不為說。由此應知，《攝論》總說凡夫、二乘，理未定故；有前過故。即解於上一句頌訖，次下解第二句。

> The Commentary states: Among the five gotras, sentient beings without gotra cannot plumb the depths of its source; therefore, it is said to be 'extremely profound'—this applies only to ordinary persons. As for the rest, those with determinate gotras of the two vehicles, whether ordinary persons or noble ones, cannot penetrate it—meaning they cannot realize it—and therefore it is called 'extremely subtle'. 'Penetrating' means truly realizing and attaining it by the anāsrava path. Because they do not realize it—not because it is not spoken to them—it is said that they 'do not penetrate'. Śrāvakas who are not ignorant of the Dharma also faithfully hear it, yet they do not cultivate it; thus there are those who are born into the formless realm, enter the cessation attainment, and so on. It is not that the Buddha does not speak of it to those with the Mahāyāna gotra, whether noble or ordinary, nor to those with indeterminate gotras among the two vehicles, whether ordinary or noble. If it were also not spoken to ordinary persons of the determinate Mahāyāna gotra, who then would practice and cultivate the contemplation of true vijñapti-mātra? How could we ourselves have heard of this consciousness? If it were not spoken to those of the two vehicles who have turned their minds, whether ordinary or noble, they should not be called 'those who have turned their minds', and would not practice the contemplation of vijñapti-mātra, the contemplation of the trisvabhāva, and so forth. It is only those excluded here to whom the Buddha does not speak to bring about their realization; it is not that he does not speak to those who are not excluded. From this one should know that the Mahāyānasaṃgraha speaks generally of ordinary persons and the two vehicles because the principle was not yet settled, and because of the aforementioned fault. This finishes explaining the first line of the verse; next below, it explains the second line.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.102](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.102)
- [Next: 4.104](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.104)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.4.103) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.103) · Pramāṇa
