<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.274 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 4.274

# 成唯識論述記 4.274

成唯識論述記 4.274

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.274](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.274)

述曰：因果不無可信此識，勸清辨等以生信也。此中可說三性有無，略述《掌珍》清辨本意，分二見之是非，定雙情之邪正。我真諦中亦非法無，但不可說為因為果，言語道斷故；俗諦之中依他、圓成有故；遍計所執無故。

> The Commentary states: Because causes and effects are not non-existent, one can have faith in this consciousness; this exhorts Bhavya and others to generate faith. Here, one may speak of the existence and non-existence of the three natures, briefly summarizing the original intent of Bhavya in the \*Karatalaratna\*, distinguishing right from wrong in the two views, and determining the erroneous and correct in both dispositions. In our ultimate truth, phenomena are likewise not non-existent; they simply cannot be spoken of as causes or fruits, because the path of speech is cut off; while in conventional truth, the dependent and the consummate exist, and the conceptually imagined is non-existent.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.273](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.273)
- [Next: 4.275](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.275)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.4.274) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.274](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.4.274) · Pramāṇa
