[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 5.134 # 成唯識論述記 5.134 成唯識論述記 5.134 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.134](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.134) 述曰：以理屬教令義明了，即一念心有二行解，若緣我時，即帶我所行相轉故。問：若緣體為我，心所為所，何故論言但緣彼識，不言緣所？為答此問： > \[The Commentary states:\] By connecting reason to scripture to clarify the meaning, a single moment of citta has two modes of understanding: when taking self as cognitive object, it operates bearing the ākāra of what belongs to a self. Question: If taking the substance is self and taking caitasikas is what belongs to a self, why does the treatise only say that it takes that consciousness as cognitive object, and not say that it takes caitasikas as cognitive object? To answer this question: > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.133](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.133) - [Next: 5.135](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.135) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.5.134) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.134](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.134) · Pramāṇa