[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 5.161 # 成唯識論述記 5.161 成唯識論述記 5.161 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.161](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.161) 述曰：又種是假，望現行法應無因緣；非實有故；如無法等。此等以教附理，非前第三師無教難。 > The Commentary states: Furthermore, if seeds were conventional, they should lack the status of being a cause-and-condition in relation to active phenomena, because they would not be substantially existent, like non-existent dharmas and the like. These \[arguments\] base reason upon scripture; they are not the objection lacking scripture made previously by the third master. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.160](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.160) - [Next: 5.162](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.162) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.5.161) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.161](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.161) · Pramāṇa