[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 5.173 # 成唯識論述記 5.173 成唯識論述記 5.173 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.173](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.173) 述曰：夫言我者是自在義，萬物主義，與一切法而為所依；心所不然，不計為我。故唯心王，是所依故。此第七識恒執為內我，非色等故，不執為外我。若唯緣識，即唯起我，無有我所。聖教說有我所，此何相違？ > The Commentary states: Now, what is called a 'self' has the meaning of mastery, the meaning of being the lord of all things, and it serves as the basis for all dharmas; mental factors are not like this, and are not conceived as the self. Therefore, it is only the cittarāja, because it is the basis. This seventh consciousness constantly grasps it as the internal self; because it is not form and the like, it does not grasp it as an external self. If it takes only the consciousness as object, then it gives rise only to \[the grasp of\] self, and there is no \[grasp of\] 'mine'. The holy teaching says that there is 'mine'; how is this not contradictory? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.172](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.172) - [Next: 5.174](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.174) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.5.173) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.52.4) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.173](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.173) · Pramāṇa