[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 5.32 # 成唯識論述記 5.32 成唯識論述記 5.32 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.32) 述曰：下理成也，其文易解。若五識間斷，故前後定唯有意識。彼第三說，眼識率爾心後定有意識尋求，此後或時散亂，或是耳等識生故，非眼識後許耳識生。以此中言，眼識後唯意識，不言五識生故，即五十二。應云：若此一意識為彼六識緣，乃至此六識為彼一意識緣，以前後定唯有意故。 > The Commentary states: Below is the establishment by principle; the text is easy to understand. If the five vijñānas are interrupted, then before and after there would definitely be only mano-vijñāna. That third fascicle says that after the abrupt mind of the eye-consciousness there is definitely the searching mano-vijñāna, and after this there is sometimes distraction, or the arising of consciousnesses like the ear\[-consciousness\]; it does not allow the arising of the ear-consciousness after the eye-consciousness. Because it is said here that after the eye-consciousness there is only mano-vijñāna, and it does not say that the five vijñānas arise, then the fifty-second fascicle should say: if this one mano-vijñāna is the condition for those six vijñānas, up to those six vijñānas being the condition for that one mano-vijñāna, because before and after there is definitely only the mind. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.31) - [Next: 5.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.33) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.5.32) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.32) · Pramāṇa