<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.670 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 5.670

# 成唯識論述記 5.670

成唯識論述記 5.670

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [5.670](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.670)

述曰：小乘救言：去、來二世雖現在無，有得現在，名成我執。難云：所得之世既無，能得之得非有；能得無故，不成我執。次大眾部、一說等四部，及化地等云：別有隨眠是不相應行，此位成就，故名成我執。

> The Commentary states: The Hīnayāna rescues its position by saying: Although the two periods of past and future do not exist in the present, there is prāpti present, and this is designated as establishing ātmagrāha. The refutation says: Since the periods that are obtained do not exist, the prāpti that obtains them cannot exist; because that which obtains does not exist, ātmagrāha is not established. Next, the four schools including the Mahāsāṃghika and Ekavyāvahārika, as well as the Mahīśāsaka and others, say: Distinct anuśayas are citta-viprayukta-saṃskāras; because they are possessed in this state, it is designated as establishing ātmagrāha.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 5.669](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.669)
- [Next: 5.671](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.671)
- [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.5.670) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.670](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.670) · Pramāṇa
