<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.88 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 5.88

# 成唯識論述記 5.88

成唯識論述記 5.88

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [5.88](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.88)

自下第三，各應為緣難。問：八識自類，如前眼識等為後眼識等依，何故受等不唯為後受等依，而眼識俱受，得與後自俱想等為依？此何故不如著名沙門義，想望想，受望受等耶？為解此難。

> The Commentary states: Below is the third: the objection that each should act as a condition. Question: For the eight consciousnesses within their own categories, as the preceding eye-consciousness serves as the basis for the subsequent eye-consciousness, why do sensation and the like not solely serve as the basis for subsequent sensation and the like, while sensation associated with eye-consciousness can serve as the basis for subsequent ideation and the like associated with itself? Why is this not like the position of the famous śramaṇa, where ideation is compared to ideation, sensation to sensation, and so on? It is to resolve this objection.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 5.87](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.87)
- [Next: 5.89](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.89)
- [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.5.88) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.88](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.5.88) · Pramāṇa
