[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 6.534 # 成唯識論述記 6.534 成唯識論述記 6.534 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.534](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.534) 述曰：謗因者，謂《對法》云：謂無施與、無愛樂、無祠祀、無妙行、無惡行等。謗果者，謂無妙行及惡行業所招異熟。謗作用者，無此世間、無彼世間、無母、無父、無化生有情等。謗實事者，謂無世間真阿羅漢等。及四見外餘邪分別，即《對法》說言：謂餘一切分別倒見。五十八說此有二種：一、增益，謂餘四見；二、損減，此謗因等，名損減。故《對法》云：一多分是損減見。即有邊等是增益見；即無因論等是損減等。謗因果等，《對法》第一、《瑜伽》第八、五十八並相違，如《別抄》會。然此見寬如增上緣，餘所不攝皆此攝故。一者名寬，不正名邪，一切不正見皆此所攝；二者義遍諸邪解者，皆入此攝。 > The Commentary states: Denying cause: the Abhidharma-samuccaya says: "that is, there is no giving, no agreeable \[conduct\], no sacrifice, no good conduct, no evil conduct, and so forth." Denying effect: that is, there is no ripening brought about by good conduct and evil conduct. Denying function: \[asserting\] there is no this world, no other world, no mother, no father, no spontaneously born beings, and so forth. Denying actual realities: that is, \[asserting\] there are no true arhats in the world, and so forth. And other wrong conceptual discriminations apart from the \[other\] four views: that is what the Abhidharma-samuccaya speaks of as "meaning all other conceptual inverted views." Fascicle 58 states that these are of two kinds: first, superimposition, meaning the other four views; second, deprecation: this denying of causes and so on is called deprecation. Thus the Abhidharma-samuccaya says: "It is for the most part a view of deprecation." That is, \[holding that the world\] has a limit, etc., are views of superimposition; holding theories of no-cause, etc., are \[views of\] deprecation, and so forth. Regarding the denial of causes and effects, etc., the first fascicle of the Abhidharma-samuccaya and the eighth and fifty-eighth fascicles of the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra conflict with one another; they are reconciled as explained in the Separate Notes. However, this view is as broad as the sovereign condition (adhipati-pratyaya), because whatever is not subsumed by the others is subsumed by this. First, its name is broad: what is not correct is called wrong, and all incorrect views are subsumed by this; second, its meaning is pervasive: all those with wrong understandings enter into this category. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.533](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.533) - [Next: 6.535](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.535) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.6.534) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (2) - [大乘阿毘達磨雜集論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.abhidharmasamuccaya!bhasya*zh-xuanzang.1.62) — Classical Chinese - [大乘百法明門論開宗義決](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2812.1.166) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.534](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.534) · Pramāṇa