[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 6.544 # 成唯識論述記 6.544 成唯識論述記 6.544 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.544](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.544) 述曰：計非道為是，道諦下邪見。雖非勝計勝，以非戒眷屬，非戒取。又不計為勝，故非戒取，至下當知。「諸如是等」者，謂等取十四不可記中有邊等四，是此中攝故。然六十二見，准五十八文。若邊見中攝，唯苦諦斷，緣苦諦為我增長，邊見隨我斷故。邪見中攝，彼自說二無因唯集諦，五現法涅槃唯滅諦，迷有漏因、迷涅槃果故。邊、無邊等四是苦、滅二諦下，迷有漏、無漏果生故。不死矯亂通四諦下斷，問答四諦及迷四諦故。既無邊見中攝者苦諦斷文，但准二十句見，見苦諦斷，即六十二中所隨我見亦爾。八十八云：二十句見為依，發六十二見等故。 > The Commentary states: Conceiving what is not the path to be the path is a wrong view under the truth of the path. Although it is conceiving what is not superior as superior, because it is not the retinue of precepts, it is not the grasping of precepts. Moreover, it is not conceived as superior, so it is not the grasping of precepts, as will be known below. "All such as these" means including the four \[views\] such as having a limit among the fourteen inexpressible matters, because they are subsumed here. However, regarding the sixty-two views, according to the text of fascicle 58: if subsumed under extreme views, they are severed only by \[the vision of\] the truth of suffering, because taking the truth of suffering as the self increases them, and extreme views are severed along with \[the view of\] the self. If subsumed under wrong views, \[the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra\] itself states that the two \[theories of\] no-cause belong only to the truth of origination, and the five \[kinds of\] nirvāṇa in visible phenomena belong only to the truth of cessation, because they are confused about contaminated causes and confused about the fruit of nirvāṇa. The four \[views\] on having a limit, being boundless, etc., fall under the two truths of suffering and cessation, because they arise from confusion about contaminated and uncontaminated fruits. The prevarications of eel-wrigglers are severed under all four truths, because they question, answer, and are confused about all four truths. Since there is no text stating that what is subsumed under extreme views is severed by the truth of suffering, one simply follows the twenty views of the body being severed by seeing the truth of suffering; that is, the view of self that is followed among the sixty-two is also like this. Fascicle 88 states: relying on the twenty views of the body, the sixty-two views are produced, and so on. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.543](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.543) - [Next: 6.545](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.545) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.6.544) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.544](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.6.544) · Pramāṇa