[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 7.31 # 成唯識論述記 7.31 成唯識論述記 7.31 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.31) 述曰：下總解二，總有四說。此初師說，無別有體，體即是癡。何以知者？《瑜伽》五十五等說是隨煩惱并癡分故；《對法》亦然。言通三性者，隨彼聚多少心、心所為體，故通三性，癡唯染中。 > The Commentary states: Below is the general explanation of the two \[remorse and sleep\], in which there are four opinions overall. This is the opinion of the first master: they have no separate substantial reality; their reality is simply delusion. How is this known? Because Yogācārabhūmi, fascicle 55 and elsewhere, states that they are secondary afflictions (upakleśa) and portions of delusion; the Abhidharma-samuccaya says the same. When it is said that they 'pervade the three moral natures' (trisvabhāva), they take as their reality however many minds and mental factors are in that collection, and hence they pervade the three natures, whereas delusion exists only within defilement. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.30) - [Next: 7.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.32) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.7.31) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.31) · Pramāṇa