[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 7.41 # 成唯識論述記 7.41 成唯識論述記 7.41 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.41) 述曰：《瑜伽》五十五說此二為世俗有故，假有自性。彼染污性分與癡相似，是彼等流，如不信等，體雖別有，仍說他分，即會論言是癡分，故名世俗有。《顯揚論》言：夢以欲、想二法為體，彼說增上者，此說遍心者，非諸夢心皆有欲故。 > The Commentary states: Because Yogācārabhūmi fascicle 55 states that these two exist conventionally (saṃvṛti-sat), they are imputed to have an intrinsic nature. That defiled portion is similar to delusion and is its outflow (niṣyanda), like faithlessness (aśraddhyā) and so forth: although its reality separately exists, it is still described as a portion of another factor; this reconciles the treatise statement that they are portions of delusion, which is why they are called conventionally existent. The Prakaraṇāryavācā states: 'Dreams take the two dharmas of desire (chanda) and ideation (saṃjñā) as their substantial reality.' That \[treatise\] speaks in terms of the predominant ones, whereas this \[treatise\] speaks in terms of those that pervade the mind, because not all dreaming minds possess desire. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.40) - [Next: 7.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.42) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.7.41) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.41) · Pramāṇa