[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 7.543 # 成唯識論述記 7.543 成唯識論述記 7.543 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.543](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.543) 述曰：此廣前依，由元迷執色等境，故生顛倒等，色等若無，應無顛倒。顛倒即諸識等緣此境色而起妄執，名為顛倒。此識等顛倒無故，便無雜染，雜染即是煩惱、業、生，或顛倒體即是煩惱、業、生，此等無故，便無二障雜染，二障雜染無故，無漏淨亦無，無所斷故，何有清淨？ > The Commentary states: This elaborates on the previous support. Because one originally grasps in delusion at objects such as form, perversions and the like arise; if form and the like were absent, perversion would not exist. "Perversion" refers to the various consciousnesses taking this objective form as condition and giving rise to false grasping; this is called perversion. Because there would be no perversion of these consciousnesses, there would be no defilement. Defilement refers to defilement, karma, and rebirth; or, the essence of perversion is itself defilement, karma, and rebirth. Because these would be absent, there would be no defilement of the two hindrances. Because the defilement of the two hindrances would be absent, uncontaminated purity would also be absent. With nothing to be severed, how could there be purity? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.542](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.542) - [Next: 7.544](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.544) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.7.543) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.543](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.543) · Pramāṇa