[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 7.72 # 成唯識論述記 7.72 成唯識論述記 7.72 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.72) 述曰：下第二師，其定是實，何以知者？五十五唯說：尋、伺假有，不言此二假有，故知實有。若爾，何言世俗有？隨他相說，以說為癡分故，非言世俗，便顯是假，如惛沈等故，如前已成。 > The Commentary states: Below is the second master: they are definitely real. How is this known? Fascicle 55 only says that investigation and examination are provisionally existent; it does not state that these two are provisionally existent, and hence we know they are really existent. If so, why does it say they are conventional existents? That was spoken in accordance with external characteristics, because they are described as portions of delusion. It is not that saying they are "conventional" thereby demonstrates they are provisional, just as with torpor and the like, as established previously. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.71) - [Next: 7.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.73) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.7.72) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.72) · Pramāṇa