<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.92 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 7.92

# 成唯識論述記 7.92

成唯識論述記 7.92

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [7.92](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.92)

述曰：捨受遍相應，彼論不待言，苦、樂不遍俱，何緣論不說？既不說有苦、樂，故知五識無。問：不說苦俱，即言五識無尋、伺？不說與樂俱，初定無尋、伺？

> The Commentary states: Because the sensation of equanimity is pervasive in its association, that treatise does not need to mention it. Pain and pleasure are not pervasive in their concurrence; for what reason would the treatise fail to mention them? Since it does not state that they have pain and pleasure, we know that the five consciousnesses lack them. Question: If not mentioning accompaniment by pain means the five consciousnesses lack investigation and examination, then does not mentioning accompaniment by pleasure mean the first dhyāna lacks investigation and examination?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 7.91](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.91)
- [Next: 7.93](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.93)
- [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.7.92) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.92](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.7.92) · Pramāṇa
