[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 8.113 # 成唯識論述記 8.113 成唯識論述記 8.113 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [8.113](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.113) 述曰：此即是前第二師說。二緣依處唯彼第五、第六依處，非餘三依處，餘三雖有此二緣依處，以相隱而復少，故不說之。此二處全，名亦顯故。論但說二隱餘少者略不說也，即以此文為不盡理，依所餘立增上易故，略不說之，隨前所應盡理不盡，除三之餘，皆增上故。 > The Commentary states: This is just the explanation of the second master above. The bases of the two conditions are solely the fifth and sixth bases, not the other three bases. Although the other three have bases for these two conditions, because their characteristics are concealed and scarce, they are not mentioned. These two bases are complete, and their names are also prominent. The treatise mentions only these two, and conceals the other scarce ones, briefly omitting them; thus this text is regarded as not fully expressing the underlying principle. Because establishing the dominant \[condition\] based on the remainder is easy, it is briefly omitted; according to what is appropriate to the preceding, whether fully expressing the underlying principle or not, whatever remains aside from the three is the dominant \[condition\]. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 8.112](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.112) - [Next: 8.114](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.114) - [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.8.113) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.113](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.113) · Pramāṇa