<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.14 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 8.14

# 成唯識論述記 8.14

成唯識論述記 8.14

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [8.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.14)

述曰：此會相違。是名想見者，《集論》中說：由如名等。是彼釋文，此因名、想、見三法以為自體，謂想、見二法如能詮名字而取境相及興執著，想能取相，執著由見。如名字起，取相執著已，隨起說故，即以三法為因，所生之說是其果也。

> The Commentary states: This reconciles the contradiction. Regarding 'name, ideation, and views': it is stated in the Abhidharma-samuccaya: 'Due to conforming to names, etc.' That is the text of its commentary. This cause takes the three dharmas of name, ideation, and views as its self-nature. That is, the two dharmas of ideation and views grasp objective marks and give rise to attachment in accordance with expressive names: ideation can grasp marks, and attachment arises from views. Arising in accordance with names, having grasped marks and formed attachments, speech subsequently arises; thus, taking the three dharmas as the cause, the generated speech is its fruit.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 8.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.13)
- [Next: 8.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.15)
- [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.8.14) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.14) · Pramāṇa
