<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.322 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 8.322

# 成唯識論述記 8.322

成唯識論述記 8.322

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [8.322](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.322)

問曰：若爾，何故《大論》第九卷末，以六識為識支廣解已云：「此於欲界具足六種，色界唯四，無色唯一。」

> Question: If so, why does the end of fascicle 9 of the Great Treatise, having extensively explained the six consciousnesses as the member of consciousness, state: "This is fully complete with six kinds in the desire realm, only four in the form realm, and only one in the formless realm"?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 8.321](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.321)
- [Next: 8.323](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.323)
- [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.8.322) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [瑜伽師地論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.yogacarabhumi*zh-xuanzang.9.92) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.322](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.322) · Pramāṇa
