<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.61 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 8.61

# 成唯識論述記 8.61

成唯識論述記 8.61

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [8.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.61)

述曰：此問不然！除牽引、生起二因，以此二因唯種子故。如前六因中引發等四因內，現行能生種為因緣者，以多間斷，非如種子性恒相續故。此〈菩薩地〉略而不說。此就不盡理據一義為言。又解。

> The Commentary states: This objection is incorrect! It excludes the traction and generative causes, because these two causes are solely seeds. As in the preceding six causes, within the four causes such as bringing-forth, actual activity that can produce seeds acts as a direct cause; because it is mostly interrupted and unlike the nature of seeds that is constantly continuous, the \*Bodhisattvabhūmi\* omits it and does not mention it. This is speaking from a single perspective without exhausting the reasoning. Another explanation is given.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 8.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.60)
- [Next: 8.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.62)
- [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.8.61) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.8.61) · Pramāṇa
