[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 9.426 # 成唯識論述記 9.426 成唯識論述記 9.426 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [9.426](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.426) 述曰：若爾，善心既有無癡，此執有癡，癡與無癡不相應故，如何可說善與不善？癡、無癡等定不相應；相違法故；如無貪、貪等。不可言此執心無無明俱，如人執心無明俱故。彼復有執第七識中唯有我執無法執故，如前第五卷解。《瓔珞經》云：善心有不善是外道義，今遮於彼，因解二障寬狹。 > The Commentary states: If so, since a wholesome mind possesses non-delusion, whereas this grasping possesses delusion, delusion and non-delusion are not associated; how could it be called wholesome and unwholesome? Delusion, non-delusion, and so forth are definitely not associated; because they are contradictory dharmas; just like non-attachment and attachment, and so forth. One cannot say that this grasping mind is not accompanied by delusion, because just like a mind of personal grasping, it is accompanied by delusion. Furthermore, they impute that within the seventh consciousness there is only ātmagrāha and no dharmagrāha, as explained earlier in the fifth fascicle. The Yingluo jing says: 'That a wholesome mind has the unwholesome is a heterodox teaching.' Now this is refuted, and on this occasion the scope of the two obstacles is explained. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 9.425](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.425) - [Next: 9.427](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.427) - [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.9.426) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.426](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.426) · Pramāṇa