<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.51 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 9.51

# 成唯識論述記 9.51

成唯識論述記 9.51

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [9.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.51)

述曰：我、法二執必無明俱，非善心中有無明故，彼無癡善根性相違故。彼前師言，此有何失？我如汝小乘尋、伺俱起，尋、伺性順，可許俱起，善心、無明性便相返。

> The Commentary states: The two graspings of self and phenomena are necessarily associated with avidyā. It is not that avidyā exists within a wholesome mind, because its nature is contrary to the wholesome root of non-delusion (amoha). The former master says: What fault is there in this? I am like your Hīnayāna vitarka and vicāra arising together: vitarka and vicāra have conforming natures and may be admitted to arise together, but a wholesome mind and avidyā have contrary natures.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 9.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.50)
- [Next: 9.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.52)
- [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.9.51) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.51) · Pramāṇa
