<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.628 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 9.628

# 成唯識論述記 9.628

成唯識論述記 9.628

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [9.628](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.628)

述曰：此為問也。第一與六現觀相攝者，《對法》第十三、《顯揚》第十七、《大論》五十五、七十一廣明。《對法》說十，《顯揚》說六或十八，《瑜伽》說六，《攝論》第六說十一種，三乘現觀各別。然有義、事、所緣三種差別，如《別抄》說。

> The Commentary states: This is a question. The first, mutual subsumption with the six clear realizations (abhisamaya), is extensively explained in Abhidharma-samuccaya fascicle 13, Prakaraṇāryavācā fascicle 17, and the Great Treatise (Yogācārabhūmi) fascicles 55 and 71. The Abhidharma-samuccaya speaks of ten, Prakaraṇāryavācā speaks of six or eighteen, Yogācārabhūmi speaks of six, and Mahāyānasaṃgraha fascicle 6 speaks of eleven kinds; clear realizations of the three vehicles differ respectively. Yet there are three differences of meaning, activity, and objective support, as explained in the Distinct Notes (Biechao).  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 9.627](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.627)
- [Next: 9.629](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.629)
- [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.9.628) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.628](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.628) · Pramāṇa
