<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.71 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830) › 9.71

# 成唯識論述記 9.71

成唯識論述記 9.71

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [9.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.71)

述曰：若如來智無見分者，即無緣用，應非智等，此即違理。等者，等取餘心、心所。難云：如來、菩薩無漏四智品，應非是智品；無見分等故；如虛空等。既成此已，翻向上成，謂凡夫、二乘等有漏善及無記智品，并無漏心品，應無法執；非染污心有二相故；如佛無漏智品，彼計如來無漏智品非有執故。《本業瓔珞經》下卷云：「明、闇一相，善、惡一心」等者，是洴沙王國安陀偈師義，故知前師所說非也。前師難云：若有漏心非皆有執，說藏識緣種，何獨遍計？

> The Commentary states: If the Tathāgata's jñāna lacks a darśanabhāga, it would lack cognitive function and should not be a jñāna, etc.; this contradicts reason. 'Etc.' includes the other cittas and caitasikas. The objection states: The anāsrava four classes of jñāna of the Tathāgatas and bodhisattvas should not be classes of jñāna; because they lack a darśanabhāga, etc.; like empty space, etc. Once this has been established, overturning \[the previous position\] establishes \[the corollary\]: namely, that the sāsrava wholesome and indeterminate classes of jñāna of ordinary persons and the two vehicles, as well as their anāsrava classes of citta, should be free of dharmagrāha; because non-defiled cittas possess the two aspects; just like the Buddha's anāsrava class of jñāna, since the opponent maintains that the Tathāgata's anāsrava class of jñāna does not possess grasping. The lower fascicle of the Benye yingluo jing says: 'Light and darkness have one single mark; good and evil are one single mind,' etc., which is the doctrine of Master Andha of the kingdom of King Bimbisāra; therefore we know that what the previous master stated is incorrect. The previous master objected: 'If sāsrava cittas do not all have grasping, why is it said that the storehouse consciousness, which takes seeds as its object, is exclusively parikalpita?'  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 9.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.70)
- [Next: 9.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.72)
- [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830~en-mt.9.71) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.71) · Pramāṇa
