[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論掌中樞要](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831) › 1.57 # 成唯識論掌中樞要 1.57 成唯識論掌中樞要 1.57 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.1.57) 論：「今造此論」等者，《疏》中二解：一、依人；二、依法。俱依能迷。若第二解依所迷釋：「生、法我無，執有，名謬；不悟無我，名為迷」者，為除情執，令生正解，正除其謬，解斷其迷。執情斷故，所執便遣，生正解，言「遣所執」也。 > On the passage in the treatise stating "Now this treatise is composed," etc., there are two explanations in the Commentary: 1. based on persons; 2. based on Dharma. Both are based on that which is capable of delusion. If the second explanation is interpreted based on the object of delusion: "The self of persons and dharmas does not exist, yet clinging to their existence is called error; not awakening to selflessness is called delusion": in order to remove emotional clingings and cause correct understanding to arise, it directly eliminates their error, and understanding severs their delusion. Because emotional clinging is severed, the imagined is thereby dispelled; generating correct understanding is described as "dispelling what is grasped." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.1.56) - [Next: 1.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.1.58) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831~en-mt.1.57) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.1.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.1.57) · Pramāṇa